The editing tools are vastly different as well, with Lightroom Classic offering much more powerful versions of the tools that the cloud-based version does. The cloud version simply isn’t designed to do the same thing. Want to find all the pictures you’ve ever shot at 1/10th of a second? Lightroom Classic makes that easy and near-instant. For instance, you can search for images shot on a particular model of camera, but Lightroom Classic allows you to filter not just by camera body but by lens, or even precise focal length, or aperture, or shutter speed.
For example, of course the cloud version of Lightroom allows you to search images via text, in the keyword and caption metadata boxes, but only allows very basic filtering. If you have a lot of images (my Lightroom library is now touching over 140,000 images, the overwhelming majority of them RAW), the cloud-based version of Lightroom simply doesn’t come close when it comes to navigating and searching very large repositories of photographs. If you can imagine it, you can probably do it here (Image credit: Dave Stevenson)
In below example, I’ve searched for folders continuing ‘yellowstone’.Lightroom Classic offers endless tools for editing. It’s particular useful if you tend to use descriptive or topical names for folders. It operates much like collection searches by filtering the list of relevant folders down to only those matching the search criteria. It’s been a while coming but now you can search folder names. In some cases the application became so unresponsive that it had to be relaunched. This bug manifested itself as an extreme slowdown over time. In addition to above improvements Adobe have also advised that a long term and extremely frustrating bug affecting a relatively small number of customers. You can read more about their experiences and findings at: Fstoppers, Puget Systems, and DPReview. So, what’s different this time? Well, rather than make an unsubstantiated claim Adobe gave some independent Photo Blogs and test houses early access to 7.2. To reflect this, Adobe have updated the system requirements to recommend 12GB of RAM, although it will still run with 4GB.Īspects of the application where Adobe claim customers should see improved performance include:īy this point you may be thinking that Adobe have made similar claims in the past but when put to the test customers were left somewhat underwhelmed. laptops) and more than 12 GB RAM will also see some improvement. That being said, computers with fewer CPU cores (e.g.
However, to take advantage of the improvements you will also need at least 12 GB RAM. These be most noticeable on more powerful computers, especially those with six and more CPU core. Lightroom 7.2 – Library Module Performance ImprovementsĪdobe are advising that you should see significant performance improvements on most computers with multiple cores.
0 kommentar(er)
